Nicoventures Trading Limited v Philip Morris Products SA & Anor
Permission to appeal is refused because the alleged errors in claim construction did not sufficiently adversely affect the obviousness analysis, and the grounds raised are more jury element than legal error.
- Parties
- Claimant/first Part 20 Defendant: Nicoventures Trading Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Philip Morris Products SA; Second Part 20 Defendant: British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Dispute / Post Judgment Consequential Hearing; Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Obviousness, Claim Construction, Permission to Appeal, Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicoventures Trading Limited
Claimant/first Part 20 Defendant
Philip Morris Products SA
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited
Second Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Dispute / Post Judgment Consequential Hearing; Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether claims were obvious over prior art including the Deevi patent
- 2 whether claim construction was over-inclusive and affected obviousness analysis
- 3 whether permission to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is refused because the alleged errors in claim construction did not sufficiently adversely affect the obviousness analysis, and the grounds raised are more jury element than legal error.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal refused
Orders
- draft order agreed by parties (except permission to appeal) is made
- application for permission to appeal must be renewed before the Court of Appeal if Philip Morris wishes to appeal further
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment