OC v CD
The mother failed to establish any of the Article 13 defences. There is no grave risk of harm or intolerable situation on return to Australia; the children's objections are not authentically their own and do not meet the threshold; and the father did not acquiesce in the retention. The children must be returned to Australia forthwith.
- Parties
- Applicant: OC; Respondent: CD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Hague Convention Child Abduction Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for summary return granted
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention 1980, Summary Return of Children, Defences to Return (grave Risk, Child's Objections, Acquiescence)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OC
Applicant
CD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Hague Convention Child Abduction Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother has established a defence under Article 13(b) of the 1980 Hague Convention (grave risk of harm/intolerable situation)
- 2 Whether the children object to return and have attained sufficient age and maturity (Article 13)
- 3 Whether the father acquiesced in the wrongful retention (Article 13(a))
Ratio Decidendi
The mother failed to establish any of the Article 13 defences. There is no grave risk of harm or intolerable situation on return to Australia; the children's objections are not authentically their own and do not meet the threshold; and the father did not acquiesce in the retention. The children must be returned to Australia forthwith.
Court Disposition
Application for summary return granted
Orders
- The children are to be returned forthwith to Australia.
- Counsel to draw up an order reflecting the decision and practical arrangements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment