Ocado Group Plc & Anor v McKeeve
The application was refused because the applicants failed to establish a prima facie case that the respondent's actions resulted in the destruction of documents of the type alleged, and thus failed to show the necessary actus reus and mens rea for criminal contempt.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ocado Group plc; Applicant: Ocado Central Services Limited; Respondent: Mr Raymond McKeeve
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Make a Committal Application (criminal Contempt) / Ruling on Permission to Proceed With Committal Application
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Search and Evidence Preservation Orders, Interference With Administration of Justice, Disclosure and Use of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ocado Group plc
Applicant
Ocado Central Services Limited
Applicant
Mr Raymond McKeeve
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Make a Committal Application (criminal Contempt) / Ruling on Permission to Proceed With Committal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants established a prima facie case for committal for criminal contempt against the respondent for interference with the due administration of justice
- 2 Whether the public interest requirement for granting permission to proceed with a committal application was satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the applicants failed to establish a prima facie case that the respondent's actions resulted in the destruction of documents of the type alleged, and thus failed to show the necessary actus reus and mens rea for criminal contempt.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Permission to make a committal application against Mr McKeeve is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment