O'Cathail v Transport for London
There was no error of law or perversity in the Employment Judge's or Employment Appeal Tribunal's refusal to consolidate claims or order specific disclosure; the applicant failed to make a clear and focused application for disclosure, and Article 6 ECHR was not breached by the case management decisions.
- Parties
- Applicant: O'CATHAIL; Respondent: Transport for London
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Consolidation of Claims, Disclosure of Documents, Judicial Discretion, Article 6 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O'CATHAIL
Applicant
Transport for London
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Judge and Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in refusing consolidation of claims
- 2 Whether the Employment Judge and Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in refusing specific disclosure
- 3 Whether the use of the Burns/Barke procedure was improper
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law or perversity in the Employment Judge's or Employment Appeal Tribunal's refusal to consolidate claims or order specific disclosure; the applicant failed to make a clear and focused application for disclosure, and Article 6 ECHR was not breached by the case management decisions.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Transcript of the judgment to be prepared and sent to the applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment