Adonis Construction v O'Keefe Soil Remediation
There is an arguable case that no construction contract in writing existed between the parties as required by the Act, and thus the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction. Accordingly, summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator’s decision is refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Adonis Construction; Defendant: O’Keefe Soil Remediation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction Dispute) / Application for Summary Judgment to Enforce Adjudicator’s Decision
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Written Construction Contracts, Letters of Intent, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adonis Construction
Claimant
O’Keefe Soil Remediation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Dispute) / Application for Summary Judgment to Enforce Adjudicator’s Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a construction contract in writing within the meaning of section 107(1) of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
- 2 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to make the award
- 3 Whether the application for summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator’s decision should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable case that no construction contract in writing existed between the parties as required by the Act, and thus the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction. Accordingly, summary judgment to enforce the adjudicator’s decision is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment