Mortell, R (on the application of) v Oldham Metropolitan Borough
The defendant failed to consider four relevant matters—cumulative effects, construction phase impacts, contamination, and architectural heritage—when issuing screening opinions for the planning permissions. This failure rendered the screening opinions unlawful and, consequently, the planning permissions must be quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mortell; Defendant: Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; planning permissions quashed; costs awarded to claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Impact Assessment, Planning Permission, Screening Opinion, Judicial Review, Housing Market Renewal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mortell
Claimant
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant failed to take into account relevant considerations in its screening opinions for planning permissions under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations
- 2 Whether the planning permissions should be quashed due to invalid screening opinions
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to consider four relevant matters—cumulative effects, construction phase impacts, contamination, and architectural heritage—when issuing screening opinions for the planning permissions. This failure rendered the screening opinions unlawful and, consequently, the planning permissions must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; planning permissions quashed; costs awarded to claimant.
Orders
- The planning permissions are quashed.
- The defendant shall pay the claimant's costs, to be assessed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment