Loudmila Bourlakova & Ors v Oleg Bourlakov & Ors
Permission to amend the Particulars of Claim and join Veronica Bourlakova as claimant is granted because no reasonably arguable limitation defence is established, English jurisdiction is confirmed under Brussels Recast and common law, England is clearly the appropriate forum, and the claims against the anchor defendant are genuine. Discretion favours permitting the amendments given the interests of justice and procedural efficiency.
- Parties
- Claimant: Loudmila Bourlakova; Claimant: Hermitage One Limited; Claimant: Greenbay Invest Holdings Limited; Claimant: Veronica Bourlakova; Defendant: Oleg Bourlakov; Defendant: Daniel Tribaldos; Defendant: Leo Services Holding Ltd; Defendant: Leo Trust Switzerland AG; Defendant: Reuwen Schwarz; Defendant: Semen Anufriev; Defendant: Nikolai Kazakov; Defendant: Vera Kazakova; Defendant: Columbus Holding and Enterprises SA; Defendant: Finco Financial Inc; Defendant: Gatiabe Business Inc; Defendant: Edelweiss Investments Inc; Defendant: IPEC International Petroleum Co Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Amendment Applications and Joinder
- Outcome
- Permission to amend and join granted
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, Limitation, Declaratory Relief, Damages, Fraud, Conspiracy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Loudmila Bourlakova
Claimant
Hermitage One Limited
Claimant
Greenbay Invest Holdings Limited
Claimant
Veronica Bourlakova
Claimant
Oleg Bourlakov
Defendant
Daniel Tribaldos
Defendant
Leo Services Holding Ltd
Defendant
Leo Trust Switzerland AG
Defendant
Reuwen Schwarz
Defendant
Semen Anufriev
Defendant
Nikolai Kazakov
Defendant
Vera Kazakova
Defendant
Columbus Holding and Enterprises SA
Defendant
Finco Financial Inc
Defendant
Gatiabe Business Inc
Defendant
Edelweiss Investments Inc
Defendant
IPEC International Petroleum Co Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Amendment Applications and Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend the Particulars of Claim and join an additional claimant
- 2 Whether limitation bars the proposed new claims
- 3 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over the proposed new claims and parties
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend the Particulars of Claim and join Veronica Bourlakova as claimant is granted because no reasonably arguable limitation defence is established, English jurisdiction is confirmed under Brussels Recast and common law, England is clearly the appropriate forum, and the claims against the anchor defendant are genuine. Discretion favours permitting the amendments given the interests of justice and procedural efficiency.
Court Disposition
Permission to amend and join granted
Orders
- Kazakovs' application to adjourn refused
- Kazakovs' application to rely on further evidence allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment