Bourlakova & Ors v Bourlakov & Ors [2024] EWHC 3524 (Ch) (05 December 2024)
The information sought by the Claimants is necessary and proportionate to clarify matters in dispute regarding alleged misappropriation of Edelweiss' assets, the value of those assets, and to prepare for both the main claim and the injunction application. Edelweiss is well placed to provide the information from its own records, and its prior vacillation undermines its proportionality objections. The request is granted with modifications to exclude information about assets or proceeds received by 'any other person' and to limit the scope of what became of such assets or proceeds.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3524 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Loudmila Bourlakova & Ors; Defendant: Oleg Bourlakov & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (chancery Division) / Interlocutory Application Ruling (cpr Part 18 Request for Information)
- Outcome
- Application granted with modification
- Legal Topics
- Requests for Further Information, Disclosure, Asset Misappropriation, Declaratory Relief, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Loudmila Bourlakova & Ors
Claimant
Oleg Bourlakov & Ors
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (chancery Division) / Interlocutory Application Ruling (cpr Part 18 Request for Information)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Edelweiss Investments Inc. must provide information under CPR Part 18 regarding asset transfers exceeding $50,000 between April 2018 and July 2020
- 2 Whether the request is reasonably necessary and proportionate under CPR PD 18
- 3 Whether the pending summary judgment application or foreign proceedings affect the exercise of discretion to order provision of information
Ratio Decidendi
The information sought by the Claimants is necessary and proportionate to clarify matters in dispute regarding alleged misappropriation of Edelweiss' assets, the value of those assets, and to prepare for both the main claim and the injunction application. Edelweiss is well placed to provide the information from its own records, and its prior vacillation undermines its proportionality objections. The request is granted with modifications to exclude information about assets or proceeds received by 'any other person' and to limit the scope of what became of such assets or proceeds.
Court Disposition
Application granted with modification
Orders
- Edelweiss Investments Inc. must provide the requested information under CPR Part 18 as modified: excluding sub-paragraphs (f) as to 'any other person' and (g) as to 'what became of such assets or proceeds' beyond Edelweiss itself.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment