Sloutsker v Romanova (Rev 1) [2015] EWHC 2053 (QB) (16 July 2015)

Sloutsker v Romanova (Rev 1) [2015] EWHC 2053 (QB) (16 July 2015)

The defendant had a full and fair opportunity to defend the claim but failed to do so; her reasons for non-engagement were unconvincing. The libels were grave, widely published in this jurisdiction, and caused serious harm to the claimant's reputation and feelings. Substantial compensatory damages and an injunction were justified.

Citation
[2015] EWHC 2053
Parties
Claimant: Vladimir Sloutsker; Defendant: Olga Romanova
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Remedies Judgment Following Default Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant. Substantial damages awarded. Injunction granted.
Legal Topics
Libel, Damages Assessment, Default Judgment, Injunctions, Jurisdiction, Access to Justice
Defamation Media Law Tort Libel Damages Assessment Default Judgment Injunctions Jurisdiction +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vladimir Sloutsker

Claimant

Olga Romanova

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Remedies Judgment Following Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was afforded a fair opportunity to defend the claim
  2. 2 Assessment of damages for libel
  3. 3 Appropriateness of an injunction restraining further publication

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant had a full and fair opportunity to defend the claim but failed to do so; her reasons for non-engagement were unconvincing. The libels were grave, widely published in this jurisdiction, and caused serious harm to the claimant's reputation and feelings. Substantial compensatory damages and an injunction were justified.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant. Substantial damages awarded. Injunction granted.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay damages to the claimant
  • Defendant restrained by injunction from further publication of the libels in this jurisdiction