Holman, R. v

Holman, R. v

The fine imposed exceeded the guideline range for careless driving, even with an uplift for the aggravating feature of death resulting, and did not sufficiently consider the appellant's means and mitigation. The default period for non-payment was unlawful. The period of disqualification was appropriate and not excessive.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Oliver David Holman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Careless Driving, Sentencing, Causing Death by Driving, Disqualification From Driving
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Careless Driving Sentencing Causing Death by Driving Disqualification From Driving

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Oliver David Holman

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the fine imposed for careless driving causing death was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the default period for non-payment of the fine was lawful
  3. 3 Whether the period of disqualification from driving was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The fine imposed exceeded the guideline range for careless driving, even with an uplift for the aggravating feature of death resulting, and did not sufficiently consider the appellant's means and mitigation. The default period for non-payment was unlawful. The period of disqualification was appropriate and not excessive.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Fine reduced to £1,000 payable at £200 per month
  • Default period for non-payment set at 28 days' custody per missed instalment