Benguit, R. v

Benguit, R. v

The judge exercised proper discretion in permitting the second retrial, considering all relevant factors and interests of justice; the admission of bad character evidence, though not explicitly under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, would have met the statutory requirements and did not undermine the safety of the...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Omar Benguit; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Retrial, Admissibility of Evidence, Bad Character Evidence
Criminal Law Murder Retrial Admissibility of Evidence Bad Character Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Omar Benguit

Appellant

Regina (The Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the second retrial was oppressive, vexatious or unjust
  2. 2 Whether the admission of bad character evidence under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was proper

Ratio Decidendi

The judge exercised proper discretion in permitting the second retrial, considering all relevant factors and interests of justice; the admission of bad character evidence, though not explicitly under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, would have met the statutory requirements and did not undermine the safety of the conviction.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence of life imprisonment upheld