Alli-Balogun v On the Beach Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 1702 (QB) (22 June 2021)
The 5th Defendant failed to show a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on liability. The facts pleaded and evidence available indicate clear negligence by the lifeguard, for which the 4th Defendant is vicariously liable and the 5th Defendant is directly liable as insurer. Joint liability under Spanish law means blaming other parties does not absolve the 4th/5th Defendants. The application to set aside was made promptly given procedural context, but absence of a realistic defence means the default judgment should remain.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1702 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss Gabrielle Alli-Balogun; Litigation Friend: Mrs Obiageli Alli-Balogun; Defendant: On The Beach Limited; Defendant: Zurich Insurance PLC Sucursal en Espana; Defendant: Hosa Hotel SL; Defendant: Institut de Balear d'Emergencies SL; Defendant: Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Post Default Judgment, Pre Trial
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment dismissed; default judgment remains in place.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Direct Action Against Insurer, Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Jurisdiction, Joint Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Gabrielle Alli-Balogun
Claimant
Mrs Obiageli Alli-Balogun
Litigation Friend
On The Beach Limited
Defendant
Zurich Insurance PLC Sucursal en Espana
Defendant
Hosa Hotel SL
Defendant
Institut de Balear d'Emergencies SL
Defendant
Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Post Default Judgment, Pre Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 5th Defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on liability
- 2 Whether the application to set aside default judgment was made promptly
- 3 Whether there is any other good reason to set aside the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The 5th Defendant failed to show a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on liability. The facts pleaded and evidence available indicate clear negligence by the lifeguard, for which the 4th Defendant is vicariously liable and the 5th Defendant is directly liable as insurer. Joint liability under Spanish law means blaming other parties does not absolve the 4th/5th Defendants. The application to set aside was made promptly given procedural context, but absence of a realistic defence means the default judgment should remain.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment dismissed; default judgment remains in place.
Orders
- Default judgment against the 5th Defendant remains.
- No order setting aside default judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment