Alli-Balogun v On the Beach Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 1702 (QB) (22 June 2021)
The 5th Defendant failed to show a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on liability. The facts pleaded and evidence (including the police report) established a strong case of negligence against the lifeguard and thus vicarious liability for the 4th Defendant and its insurer. The absence of a factual defence or evidence from the lifeguard, and the joint and several liability regime under Spanish law, meant the insurer's arguments lacked conviction. The application to set aside was made promptly in the circumstances, but as there was no real prospect of a successful defence, the default judgment should remain.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1702
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss Gabrielle Alli-Balogun (a child, by her Mother & Litigation Friend, Mrs Obiageli Alli-Balogun); Defendant: On The Beach Limited; Defendant: Zurich Insurance PLC Sucursal en Espana; Defendant: HOSA Hotel SL; Defendant: Institut de Balear d'Emergencies SL; Defendant: Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (queen's Bench Division, High Court) / Post Default Judgment, Pre Trial, Application to Set Aside Default Judgment Under CPR 13.3
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment dismissed; default judgment remains in place.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Direct Action Against Insurer, Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Jurisdiction, Spanish Law Application, Joint and Several Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Gabrielle Alli-Balogun (a child, by her Mother & Litigation Friend, Mrs Obiageli Alli-Balogun)
Claimant
On The Beach Limited
Defendant
Zurich Insurance PLC Sucursal en Espana
Defendant
HOSA Hotel SL
Defendant
Institut de Balear d'Emergencies SL
Defendant
Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (queen's Bench Division, High Court) / Post Default Judgment, Pre Trial, Application to Set Aside Default Judgment Under CPR 13.3
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 5th Defendant (insurer) has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim so as to justify setting aside default judgment under CPR 13.3
- 2 Whether there is any other good reason to set aside the default judgment
- 3 Whether the application to set aside was made promptly
Ratio Decidendi
The 5th Defendant failed to show a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on liability. The facts pleaded and evidence (including the police report) established a strong case of negligence against the lifeguard and thus vicarious liability for the 4th Defendant and its insurer. The absence of a factual defence or evidence from the lifeguard, and the joint and several liability regime under Spanish law, meant the insurer's arguments lacked conviction. The application to set aside was made promptly in the circumstances, but as there was no real prospect of a successful defence, the default judgment should remain.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment dismissed; default judgment remains in place.
Orders
- Default judgment against the 5th Defendant (Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA) to stand.
- Costs of the application to be paid by the 5th Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment