Nokia Technologies OY & Nor v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd & Ors (Rev1) [2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat) (04 November 2021)

Nokia Technologies OY & Nor v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd & Ors (Rev1) [2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat) (04 November 2021)

The dispute is properly characterised as concerning infringement, essentiality, and validity of UK patents and associated FRAND relief, not merely a global FRAND licence. England is the appropriate forum for these claims, and the existence of parallel Chinese proceedings does not justify a stay. No rare or compelling circumstances exist to warrant a case management stay.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat)
Parties
Claimant: Nokia Technologies Oy; Claimant: Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy; Defendant: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd; Defendant: Unumplus Limited (t/a OnePlus); Defendant: Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp, Ltd; Defendant: Oppo Mobile UK Ltd; Defendant: Ascension International Trading Co., Ltd (t/a Realme); Defendant: Realme Mobile Telecommunications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd; Defendant: Realme Chongqing Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and FRAND Licensing Dispute / Interlocutory Application on Jurisdiction and Case Management Stay
Outcome
Applications to set aside service and for a stay refused
Legal Topics
FRAND Licensing, Jurisdiction, Forum Conveniens, Case Management Stay, Standard Essential Patents (seps)
Intellectual Property Patents Civil Procedure FRAND Licensing Jurisdiction Forum Conveniens Case Management Stay Standard Essential Patents (seps)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nokia Technologies Oy

Claimant

Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy

Claimant

OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd

Defendant

Unumplus Limited (t/a OnePlus)

Defendant

Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp, Ltd

Defendant

Oppo Mobile UK Ltd

Defendant

Ascension International Trading Co., Ltd (t/a Realme)

Defendant

Realme Mobile Telecommunications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd

Defendant

Realme Chongqing Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Patent Infringement and FRAND Licensing Dispute / Interlocutory Application on Jurisdiction and Case Management Stay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over non-UK defendants for patent infringement and FRAND determination
  2. 2 Whether proceedings should be stayed on forum conveniens or case management grounds in favour of Chinese proceedings
  3. 3 Proper characterisation of the dispute for forum analysis

Ratio Decidendi

The dispute is properly characterised as concerning infringement, essentiality, and validity of UK patents and associated FRAND relief, not merely a global FRAND licence. England is the appropriate forum for these claims, and the existence of parallel Chinese proceedings does not justify a stay. No rare or compelling circumstances exist to warrant a case management stay.

Court Disposition

Applications to set aside service and for a stay refused

Orders

  • Permission to serve out of the jurisdiction on non-UK defendants upheld
  • No stay of proceedings granted on forum conveniens or case management grounds