Nokia Technologies OY & Anor v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 1912 (Pat) (26 July 2023)
Oppo's undertakings to take a licence on FRAND terms set by the Chongqing court do not prevent Nokia from seeking an injunction in the UK. Oppo is not already licensed nor a Clause 6.1 Beneficiary under the ETSI IPR Policy for these purposes. Only an undertaking to take a licence on terms set by the English court suffices to avoid injunctive relief. The content of a FRAND licence, including standstill provisions, is not to be determined at this stage but at the subsequent Trial D.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 1912 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: Nokia Technologies Oy; Claimant: Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy; Defendant: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd; Defendant: Unumplus Limited (t/a OnePlus); Defendant: Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp, Ltd; Defendant: Oppo Mobile UK Ltd; Defendant: Ascension International Trading Co., Limited (t/a Realme); Defendant: Realme Mobile Telecommunications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd; Defendant: Realme Chongqing Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Patents/frand Determination / Post Infringement, Pre Final FRAND Terms, Determination of Effect of Undertakings (trial E)
- Outcome
- All declarations sought by Oppo refused. Declaration sought by Nokia granted.
- Legal Topics
- Standard Essential Patents (seps), FRAND Licensing, Abuse of Dominance, Jurisdiction, Declaratory Relief, Foreign Law (french, Chinese), Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nokia Technologies Oy
Claimant
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Claimant
OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
Defendant
Unumplus Limited (t/a OnePlus)
Defendant
Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp, Ltd
Defendant
Oppo Mobile UK Ltd
Defendant
Ascension International Trading Co., Limited (t/a Realme)
Defendant
Realme Mobile Telecommunications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd
Defendant
Realme Chongqing Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patents/frand Determination / Post Infringement, Pre Final FRAND Terms, Determination of Effect of Undertakings (trial E)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Oppo's undertakings to take a licence on FRAND terms set by the Chongqing court prevent Nokia from seeking an injunction in the UK
- 2 Whether Oppo is already licensed or a Clause 6.1 Beneficiary under the ETSI IPR Policy
- 3 Whether it is an abuse of dominance for Nokia to seek injunctive relief in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Oppo's undertakings to take a licence on FRAND terms set by the Chongqing court do not prevent Nokia from seeking an injunction in the UK. Oppo is not already licensed nor a Clause 6.1 Beneficiary under the ETSI IPR Policy for these purposes. Only an undertaking to take a licence on terms set by the English court suffices to avoid injunctive relief. The content of a FRAND licence, including standstill provisions, is not to be determined at this stage but at the subsequent Trial D.
Court Disposition
All declarations sought by Oppo refused. Declaration sought by Nokia granted.
Orders
- Oppo is not entitled to the declarations sought regarding Clause 6.1 Beneficiary status, licence status, or abuse of dominance.
- Nokia is granted a declaration that, save insofar as the Defendants undertake to the Court to take a licence on terms determined by the Court to be FRAND, the Defendants do not fall within the class of beneficiaries of clause 6.1 of the ETSI IPR Policy and are not entitled to rely upon or enforce the undertakings...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment