Ardic & Ors v R.
The sentences for Ardic and Tekagac were manifestly excessive given the extent of the injuries and the circumstances; determinate sentences provided sufficient protection. Onel’s offending and risk justified an extended sentence, but the custodial term was reduced to reflect the actual level of harm.
- Parties
- Appellant: Onur Ardic; Appellant: Mehmet Tekagac; Appellant: Hussain Onel; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Violent Disorder, Application of Corrosive Fluid With Intent, Robbery, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Extended Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onur Ardic
Appellant
Mehmet Tekagac
Appellant
Hussain Onel
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the judge was correct to find the appellants dangerous and impose extended sentences
- 3 Whether factual findings by the sentencing judge were accurate
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences for Ardic and Tekagac were manifestly excessive given the extent of the injuries and the circumstances; determinate sentences provided sufficient protection. Onel’s offending and risk justified an extended sentence, but the custodial term was reduced to reflect the actual level of harm.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed in part
Orders
- Onel: extended sentence of 20 years quashed and substituted with 19 years (16 years custodial, 3 years extended licence)
- Tekagac: extended sentence of 17½ years quashed and substituted with 14 years determinate imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment