OPO v MLA & Anor
All passages identified by the defendant are sufficiently graphic and disturbing to a vulnerable child and should remain injuncted; the order is proportionate and compliant with statutory requirements.
- Parties
- Appellant: OPO; First Respondent: MLA; Second Respondent: STL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Submissions Following Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim injunction maintained; passages remain injuncted as per Confidential Schedule 3.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Publication of Confidential Information, Protection of Vulnerable Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OPO
Appellant
MLA
First Respondent
STL
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Submissions Following Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certain graphic extracts from the book 'Instrumental' should remain injuncted to protect the claimant
- 2 Interpretation of 'graphic account' in the context of mental illness, sexual abuse, and self-harm
- 3 Proportionality of the order and compliance with Human Rights Act requirements
Ratio Decidendi
All passages identified by the defendant are sufficiently graphic and disturbing to a vulnerable child and should remain injuncted; the order is proportionate and compliant with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction maintained; passages remain injuncted as per Confidential Schedule 3.
Orders
- Passages identified by the defendant to remain in Confidential Schedule 3 and not to be published.
- Order is proportionate and compliant with Section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment