Aven & Ors v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd

Aven & Ors v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd

Orbis breached the Fourth Data Protection Principle by failing to take reasonable steps to verify the allegation that claimants used Govorun to deliver illicit cash to Putin; this constituted inaccurate sensitive personal data and entitled claimants to compensation.

Parties
Claimant: Petr Aven; Claimant: Mikhail Fridman; Claimant: German Khan; Defendant: Orbis Business Intelligence Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed
Legal Topics
Data Protection Act 1998, Accuracy of Personal Data, Legal Purposes Exemption, National Security Exemption, Remedies for Inaccurate Data

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petr Aven

Claimant

Mikhail Fridman

Claimant

German Khan

Claimant

Orbis Business Intelligence Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Memorandum 112 contains personal data relating to claimants
  2. 2 Whether processing was protected by Legal Purposes Exemption
  3. 3 Whether processing was protected by National Security Exemption

Ratio Decidendi

Orbis breached the Fourth Data Protection Principle by failing to take reasonable steps to verify the allegation that claimants used Govorun to deliver illicit cash to Putin; this constituted inaccurate sensitive personal data and entitled claimants to compensation.

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed

Orders

  • Limited rectification order for inaccurate data
  • Compensation awarded to first and second claimants (£18,000 each)