Aven & Ors v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2020] EWHC 1812 (QB) (08 July 2020)
Memorandum 112 contained personal data and sensitive personal data of the first and second claimants, including allegations of criminal conduct. Orbis' processing was not exempt under the Legal Purposes or National Security exemptions for the Fusion Disclosure. The data was inaccurate or misleading in certain respects, and Orbis failed to take reasonable steps to ensure accuracy. The claimants are entitled to a declaration of inaccuracy, rectification, and notification to Fusion, but not to compensation.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1812
- Parties
- Claimant: Petr Aven; Claimant: Mikhail Fridman; Claimant: German Khan; Defendant: Orbis Business Intelligence Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Data Protection Claim Under the Data Protection Act 1998 / High Court Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Personal Data, Sensitive Personal Data, Accuracy Principle, Fairness Principle, Legal Purposes Exemption, National Security Exemption, Remedies Under DPA
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petr Aven
Claimant
Mikhail Fridman
Claimant
German Khan
Claimant
Orbis Business Intelligence Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Data Protection Claim Under the Data Protection Act 1998 / High Court Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Memorandum 112 contained personal data of the claimants
- 2 Whether the data was sensitive personal data
- 3 Whether Orbis' processing was exempt under the Legal Purposes or National Security exemptions
Ratio Decidendi
Memorandum 112 contained personal data and sensitive personal data of the first and second claimants, including allegations of criminal conduct. Orbis' processing was not exempt under the Legal Purposes or National Security exemptions for the Fusion Disclosure. The data was inaccurate or misleading in certain respects, and Orbis failed to take reasonable steps to ensure accuracy. The claimants are entitled to a declaration of inaccuracy, rectification, and notification to Fusion, but not to compensation.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Declaration that certain personal data in Memorandum 112 is inaccurate
- Order for rectification of the inaccurate data
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment