Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd v Orchard Tankers PTE Ltd
Failure by the sellers to commence arbitration within 30 days of the buyer's cancellation, as required by the contract, bars the right to dispute the cancellation. The arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction is not ousted by the sellers' late reference, and the application under section 67 and for leave to appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is refused.
- Parties
- First Claimant: Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd; Second Claimant: Jiangsu Skyrun International Group Co Ltd; Defendant: Orchard Tankers PTE Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Arbitration Challenge / Judgment on Application to Challenge Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction and for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Time Bar Clauses, Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal, Interpretation of Shipbuilding Contracts, Refund Guarantees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd
First Claimant
Jiangsu Skyrun International Group Co Ltd
Second Claimant
Orchard Tankers PTE Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Arbitration Challenge / Judgment on Application to Challenge Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction and for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to commence arbitration within 30 days bars the seller's right to dispute contract termination
- 2 Whether the arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996
- 3 Whether leave to appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Failure by the sellers to commence arbitration within 30 days of the buyer's cancellation, as required by the contract, bars the right to dispute the cancellation. The arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction is not ousted by the sellers' late reference, and the application under section 67 and for leave to appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is refused.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is refused
- Leave to appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment