Societa Esplosivi Industriali SPA v Ordnance Technologies Ltd. & Ors [2004] EWHC 48 (Ch) (21 January 2004)
The court held that SEI (UK) and its directors breached the Teaming and Agency Agreements by diverting the Raytheon dynamic firing test contract and misusing confidential information and intellectual property belonging to SEI. The relevant restraint of trade clauses were reasonable and enforceable. SEI was entitled...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 48 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Societa Esplosivi Industriali S.p.A.; Defendant: Ordnance Technologies Limited (formerly SEI (UK) Limited); Defendant: Impact Sciences Limited; Defendant: Stephen Keith Cardy; Defendant: Robin Moat; Defendant: David Haigh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Action / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Teaming Agreements, Intellectual Property Rights, Breach of Contract, Restraint of Trade, Agency, Consultancy Agreements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Societa Esplosivi Industriali S.p.A.
Claimant
Ordnance Technologies Limited (formerly SEI (UK) Limited)
Defendant
Impact Sciences Limited
Defendant
Stephen Keith Cardy
Defendant
Robin Moat
Defendant
David Haigh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Action / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Ownership and exploitation of intellectual property rights under successive Teaming Agreements
- 2 Breach of contract and fiduciary duties by SEI (UK) and its directors
- 3 Validity and enforceability of restraint of trade clauses
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that SEI (UK) and its directors breached the Teaming and Agency Agreements by diverting the Raytheon dynamic firing test contract and misusing confidential information and intellectual property belonging to SEI. The relevant restraint of trade clauses were reasonable and enforceable. SEI was entitled to declarations as to ownership of IPR, injunctive relief, and an account of profits.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant
Orders
- Declaration that SEI owns the relevant foreground and background intellectual property rights as set out in the Teaming Agreements.
- Injunction restraining SEI (UK) and its directors from exploiting or disclosing SEI's confidential information and IPR.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment