R v Osmam Ahmet

R v Osmam Ahmet

The judge was entitled to categorise the offending as high culpability and greater harm due to abuse of position and the scale of offending. The sentence imposed, after considering all mitigating factors and the appellant's guilty plea, was not manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Osmam Ahmet
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fraud, Sentencing, Abuse of Position, Public Safety
Criminal Law Fraud Sentencing Abuse of Position Public Safety

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Osmam Ahmet

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the offence as high culpability and greater harm under the sentencing guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to categorise the offending as high culpability and greater harm due to abuse of position and the scale of offending. The sentence imposed, after considering all mitigating factors and the appellant's guilty plea, was not manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of 28 months' imprisonment upheld