Oss Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 611 (28 June 2007)
A material processed from waste lubricating oil can cease to be waste before combustion if it has been converted into a distinct, marketable product that can be used in the same way as an ordinary fuel, with no greater environmental risk, and is not being discarded. The Agency's position that waste status persists until combustion is too narrow and not supported by European case law.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 611
- Parties
- Appellant: OSS Group Limited; Respondents: Environment Agency & Ors; Intervener: DEFRA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Appeal From Qbd, Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Waste Framework Directive, Definition of Waste, End of Waste Criteria, Recovery Operations, Waste Oils Directive, Judicial Interpretation of EU Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OSS Group Limited
Appellant
Environment Agency & Ors
Respondents
DEFRA
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Appeal From Qbd, Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 When does material processed from waste lubricating oil cease to be 'waste' under the Waste Framework Directive?
- 2 Is the material still 'waste' when prepared for use as fuel, or only when actually combusted?
Ratio Decidendi
A material processed from waste lubricating oil can cease to be waste before combustion if it has been converted into a distinct, marketable product that can be used in the same way as an ordinary fuel, with no greater environmental risk, and is not being discarded. The Agency's position that waste status persists until combustion is too narrow and not supported by European case law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; the appeal question is determined in the affirmative. No further order is made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment