The Paddington Building Society v Malcolm Leslie Mendlesohn [1985] EWCA Civ 17 (02 April 1985)
Where a party's equitable interest in registered land is, by the intention of the parties at acquisition, subject to the rights of a mortgagee, section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925 does not enlarge that interest to give it priority over the mortgagee, even if the party is in actual occupation at the relevant time.
- Citation
- [1985] EWCA Civ 17
- Parties
- Claimant: Paddington Building Society; First Defendant: Mr. Mendlesohn; Second Defendant: Mrs. Mendlesohn
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Mortgage Possession Claim / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Overriding Interests, Actual Occupation, Priority of Interests, Registered Land, Mortgagee Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paddington Building Society
Claimant
Mr. Mendlesohn
First Defendant
Mrs. Mendlesohn
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Mortgage Possession Claim / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs. Mendlesohn's equitable interest constitutes an overriding interest under section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925
- 2 Whether the relevant date for actual occupation is the date of the mortgage or the date of registration of the charge
- 3 Whether Mrs. Mendlesohn's rights as a consenting party to the mortgage are subject to the rights of the Society
Ratio Decidendi
Where a party's equitable interest in registered land is, by the intention of the parties at acquisition, subject to the rights of a mortgagee, section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925 does not enlarge that interest to give it priority over the mortgagee, even if the party is in actual occupation at the relevant time.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order for costs save legal and taxation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment