Bilverstone, R (On the Application Of) v Oxford City Council
The ECP was not precluded from considering the claimant's transfer application by virtue of the homelessness decision. The Council's approach was erroneous in law; the two procedures are not mutually exclusive, and the claimant was entitled to have her case properly considered by the ECP regardless of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Linda Bilverstone; Defendant: Oxford City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; ECP decision quashed
- Legal Topics
- Homelessness, Council Housing Allocation, Domestic Violence, Judicial Review Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Linda Bilverstone
Claimant
Oxford City Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Exceptional Circumstances Panel (ECP) was precluded from considering the claimant's transfer application after a favourable homelessness decision under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996
- 2 Whether the Council's failure to refer the claimant's case to the ECP at an earlier stage unlawfully prejudiced her rights
Ratio Decidendi
The ECP was not precluded from considering the claimant's transfer application by virtue of the homelessness decision. The Council's approach was erroneous in law; the two procedures are not mutually exclusive, and the claimant was entitled to have her case properly considered by the ECP regardless of the homelessness outcome.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; ECP decision quashed
Orders
- The decision of the Exceptional Circumstances Panel dated 17 March 2003 is quashed.
- The ECP must give lawful consideration to Mrs Bilverstone's case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment