Oyston Estates Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Fylde Borough Council
Section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 establishes discrete, sequential opportunities for legal challenge at specified stages of the neighbourhood plan process, each with a strict six-week time limit. A claim challenging the council's consideration of the examiner's report must be brought under section 61N(2) within six weeks of publication of that decision. The appellant's claim, although framed as a challenge to the making of the plan, was in substance a challenge to the earlier stage and was therefore out of time. Section 61N(1) does not provide a route for challenge where the grievance relates to an earlier stage covered by section 61N(2).
- Parties
- Appellant: Oyston Estates Ltd.; Respondent: Fylde Borough Council; Interested Party: St Anne’s on the Sea Town Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review, Neighbourhood Development Plans, Time Limits for Legal Challenges
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oyston Estates Ltd.
Appellant
Fylde Borough Council
Respondent
St Anne’s on the Sea Town Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for judicial review was brought within the statutory time limits under section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Proper interpretation of section 61N regarding stages and timing of legal challenges to neighbourhood plan decisions
- 3 Scope of challenge under section 61N(1) versus section 61N(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 establishes discrete, sequential opportunities for legal challenge at specified stages of the neighbourhood plan process, each with a strict six-week time limit. A claim challenging the council's consideration of the examiner's report must be brought under section 61N(2) within six weeks of publication of that decision. The appellant's claim, although framed as a challenge to the making of the plan, was in substance a challenge to the earlier stage and was therefore out of time. Section 61N(1) does not provide a route for challenge where the grievance relates to an earlier stage covered by section 61N(2).
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment