Ozturk v Ozturk

Ozturk v Ozturk

The respondent was personally served with the court order requiring him to file Form E, failed to comply within the specified timeframe, and has demonstrated a deliberate and repeated refusal to engage with proceedings. This constitutes contempt of court, justifying a suspended custodial sentence and an order for costs.

Parties
Applicant: Ozturk; Respondent: Ozturk
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Committal Application for Contempt in Financial Remedy Proceedings / Judgment Following Hearing on Notice to Show Cause
Outcome
Application for committal granted; respondent found in contempt.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Financial Disclosure, Committal Proceedings, Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ozturk

Applicant

Ozturk

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Committal Application for Contempt in Financial Remedy Proceedings / Judgment Following Hearing on Notice to Show Cause

  1. 1 Whether the respondent breached para.6 of the order of 8th October 2024 by failing to file Form E
  2. 2 Whether the breach was wilful and repeated
  3. 3 Appropriate punishment for contempt

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent was personally served with the court order requiring him to file Form E, failed to comply within the specified timeframe, and has demonstrated a deliberate and repeated refusal to engage with proceedings. This constitutes contempt of court, justifying a suspended custodial sentence and an order for costs.

Court Disposition

Application for committal granted; respondent found in contempt.

Orders

  • Respondent sentenced to 28 days imprisonment suspended upon compliance with order to file Form E within 28 days of service.
  • Respondent to pay costs of £2,210.40 within 14 days.