M v P
Decrees granted in breach of section 1(2)(d) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 are voidable, not void, where the court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition and another fact existed at the date of the petition; discretion must be exercised to uphold the decrees given the parties' reliance and innocent status; the decree nisi may be varied to reflect the amended petition.
- Parties
- Petitioner: M; Respondent: P; Intervener: The Queen’s Proctor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce / Application to Set Aside Decree Absolute
- Outcome
- Application to set aside decrees dismissed; decrees upheld as valid and in force.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Jurisdiction, Procedural Irregularity, Void Vs Voidable Decrees, Amendment of Petition, Legal Aid
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Petitioner
P
Respondent
The Queen’s Proctor
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Application to Set Aside Decree Absolute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether decrees of divorce granted in breach of section 1(2)(d) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 are void or voidable
- 2 Whether the court has power to amend the decree nisi to reflect the amended petition
- 3 Whether discretion should be exercised to uphold the decrees given the parties' circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Decrees granted in breach of section 1(2)(d) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 are voidable, not void, where the court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition and another fact existed at the date of the petition; discretion must be exercised to uphold the decrees given the parties' reliance and innocent status; the decree nisi may be varied to reflect the amended petition.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside decrees dismissed; decrees upheld as valid and in force.
Orders
- Decree nisi varied under FPR 4.1(6) to reflect amended petition (unreasonable behaviour)
- Decree absolute remains valid and in force
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment