PR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor
The appellant was not entitled to backdated housing benefit from 16 January 2019 because regulation 83(12)/(12A) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 only permits backdating by one month, and regulation 83(5)(a) did not apply as there was no new claim for ESA, only a revision. The October 2018 form was not a valid claim for housing benefit. The First-tier Tribunal made no error of law in its decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: P. R.; 1st Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; 2nd Respondent: Allerdale Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From First Tier Tribunal (social Entitlement Chamber) to Upper Tribunal (administrative Appeals Chamber) / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; First-tier Tribunal decision upheld; no error of law found.
- Legal Topics
- Housing Benefit, Universal Credit, Severe Disability Premium, Backdating of Benefits, Transitional Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. R.
Appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
1st Respondent
Allerdale Borough Council
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From First Tier Tribunal (social Entitlement Chamber) to Upper Tribunal (administrative Appeals Chamber) / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to backdated housing benefit from the date the Severe Disability Gateway opened (16 January 2019) due to retrospective entitlement to the severe disability premium in ESA.
- 2 Whether regulation 83(5)(a) or regulation 83(12)/(12A) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 permitted such backdating.
- 3 Whether there was an outstanding undecided claim for housing benefit from October 2018.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not entitled to backdated housing benefit from 16 January 2019 because regulation 83(12)/(12A) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 only permits backdating by one month, and regulation 83(5)(a) did not apply as there was no new claim for ESA, only a revision. The October 2018 form was not a valid claim for housing benefit. The First-tier Tribunal made no error of law in its decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; First-tier Tribunal decision upheld; no error of law found.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment