P, R. v
A juror's professional expertise in child protection does not constitute grounds for discharge absent personal knowledge or connection to the case; the trial judge erred in imposing life sentences without meeting statutory and case law requirements; the appropriate sentence is a determinate term reflecting the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: P; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Jury Bias, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a juror's professional expertise in child protection creates a perception of bias
- 2 Whether the trial judge properly imposed life sentences under relevant statutory and case law
- 3 Appropriate sentencing for multiple sexual offences including rape and indecent images
Ratio Decidendi
A juror's professional expertise in child protection does not constitute grounds for discharge absent personal knowledge or connection to the case; the trial judge erred in imposing life sentences without meeting statutory and case law requirements; the appropriate sentence is a determinate term reflecting the totality of offending.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part
Orders
- Life sentences quashed
- Substituted sentence of 20 years' imprisonment on count 15 (rape of SD)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment