Ware v Paddy French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB) (24 February 2021)

Ware v Paddy French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB) (24 February 2021)

The Article conveys as a matter of fact that Mr Ware is a rogue journalist who engaged in dirty tricks aimed at harming the Labour Party's election chances by authoring and presenting a Panorama programme that was biased and knowingly false, deliberately ignoring contrary evidence. These are serious allegations of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 384
Parties
Claimant: John Ware; Defendant: Paddy French
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Libel Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant.
Legal Topics
Libel, Meaning of Defamatory Statements, Fact Vs Opinion, Defamatory Tendency, Political Journalism
Defamation Media Law Libel Meaning of Defamatory Statements Fact Vs Opinion Defamatory Tendency Political Journalism

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ware

Claimant

Paddy French

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the Article?
  2. 2 Does the Article convey statements of fact or opinion?
  3. 3 Is the meaning as determined defamatory at common law?

Ratio Decidendi

The Article conveys as a matter of fact that Mr Ware is a rogue journalist who engaged in dirty tricks aimed at harming the Labour Party's election chances by authoring and presenting a Panorama programme that was biased and knowingly false, deliberately ignoring contrary evidence. These are serious allegations of deliberate wrongdoing and are defamatory at common law.

Court Disposition

Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant.

Orders

  • The meaning of the Article is as set out by the Court, substantially as pleaded by the Claimant.
  • The Article conveys statements of fact, not opinion.