Curran v Collins

Curran v Collins

Ms Curran failed to establish any agreement, arrangement, or understanding that she was to have a beneficial interest in the properties or the business. The trial judge's findings that there was no common intention, no significant financial or non-financial contribution, and no detrimental reliance were supported by the evidence. The so-called 'Excuse' given by Mr Collins did not amount to a representation capable of founding a constructive trust. The appeal court found no error in the trial judge's evaluation of credibility or application of legal principles.

Parties
Appellant: Pamela Curran; Respondent: Brian Collins
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Trusts, Beneficial Ownership, Cohabitation, Partnerships, Detrimental Reliance
Property Law Equity Constructive Trusts Beneficial Ownership Cohabitation Partnerships Detrimental Reliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pamela Curran

Appellant

Brian Collins

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ms Curran was entitled to a beneficial interest in properties held in Mr Collins' sole name
  2. 2 Whether Ms Curran was a partner in the kennels business
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in findings of fact and law regarding common intention, financial contributions, and detrimental reliance

Ratio Decidendi

Ms Curran failed to establish any agreement, arrangement, or understanding that she was to have a beneficial interest in the properties or the business. The trial judge's findings that there was no common intention, no significant financial or non-financial contribution, and no detrimental reliance were supported by the evidence. The so-called 'Excuse' given by Mr Collins did not amount to a representation capable of founding a constructive trust. The appeal court found no error in the trial judge's evaluation of credibility or application of legal principles.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed in full
  • Order for payment of £3,500 by Mr Collins to Ms Curran for her interest in the Airedale dogs stands (no appeal or cross-appeal on this point)