Bunge SA v Pan Ocean Ltd (“Sagar Ratan”)
Bayuquan was not an 'Affected Area' under Clause 129 as quarantine resulted from crew infection, not port characteristics; Clause 129(h)(iii) requires causation between visit to Affected Area and delay; off-hire clauses 38 and 50 triggered by crew illness and resulting detention/quarantine; vessel did not perform service immediately required during period of delay.
- Parties
- Claimant: Bunge S. A.; Defendant: Pan Ocean Co., Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Charterparty Interpretation, Off Hire Clauses, COVID 19 Quarantine, BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Diseases Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bunge S. A.
Claimant
Pan Ocean Co., Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Diseases Clause for Time Charter Parties 2015 (Clause 129)
- 2 Definition and application of 'Affected Area' under Clause 129
- 3 Causation requirement under Clause 129(h)(iii)
Ratio Decidendi
Bayuquan was not an 'Affected Area' under Clause 129 as quarantine resulted from crew infection, not port characteristics; Clause 129(h)(iii) requires causation between visit to Affected Area and delay; off-hire clauses 38 and 50 triggered by crew illness and resulting detention/quarantine; vessel did not perform service immediately required during period of delay.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Tribunal's award upheld
- Owners not entitled to recover withheld hire or indemnity
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment