Lalmalek al Bulushi v Paratus AMC Limited

Lalmalek al Bulushi v Paratus AMC Limited

The claimant has persistently sought to relitigate an issue already determined to be without merit; extension of the ECRO is necessary to protect the court's resources and prevent vexatious litigation.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Miss Lalmalek Al Bulushi; Defendant: Paratus AMC Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Extend Extended Civil Restraint Order
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Civil Restraint Orders, Vexatious Litigation, Mortgage Law
Civil Procedure Civil Restraint Orders Vexatious Litigation Mortgage Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss Lalmalek Al Bulushi

Claimant

Paratus AMC Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Extend Extended Civil Restraint Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the extended civil restraint order (ECRO) against the claimant should be extended
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's repeated applications are totally without merit

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant has persistently sought to relitigate an issue already determined to be without merit; extension of the ECRO is necessary to protect the court's resources and prevent vexatious litigation.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • The extended civil restraint order is extended by a further period of two years, up to and including 20 October 2023.