Gourlay, R (on the application of) v Parole Board [2014] EWHC 4763 (Admin) (24 November 2014)
The Parole Board's decision was unlawful because it failed to take into account all relevant factors in assessing the claimant's risk, relying solely on his denial of offending, contrary to established legal principles requiring a balanced assessment of all material considerations.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 4763 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Gourlay; Defendant: Parole Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Substantive Application
- Outcome
- Decision of the Parole Board quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Parole Board Decisions, Risk Assessment in Parole, Denial of Guilt and Parole, Procedural Fairness in Parole Hearings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gourlay
Claimant
Parole Board
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Substantive Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Parole Board's refusal to recommend transfer to open conditions was lawful
- 2 Whether the Parole Board failed to take into account all relevant factors in assessing risk
- 3 Whether excessive emphasis was placed on the claimant's denial of offending
Ratio Decidendi
The Parole Board's decision was unlawful because it failed to take into account all relevant factors in assessing the claimant's risk, relying solely on his denial of offending, contrary to established legal principles requiring a balanced assessment of all material considerations.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Parole Board quashed.
Orders
- The Parole Board's decision not to recommend transfer to open conditions is quashed.
- Claimant granted 48 hours to make written submissions on costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment