Paul Somers, R (on the application of) v Parole Board for England and Wales

Paul Somers, R (on the application of) v Parole Board for England and Wales

The Parole Board's failure to concede the claim or agree to a consent order in the face of clear authority and obvious error was unreasonable. This conduct justifies a costs order against the Board, consistent with the principles in Davies and subsequent authorities.

Parties
Claimant: Paul Somers; Defendant: Parole Board for England and Wales
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Determination of Costs Following Judgment
Outcome
Costs awarded to Claimant
Legal Topics
Costs in Judicial Review, Parole Board Decisions, Oral Hearings, Unreasonable Failure to Settle
Administrative Law Judicial Review Costs in Judicial Review Parole Board Decisions Oral Hearings Unreasonable Failure to Settle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Somers

Claimant

Parole Board for England and Wales

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Determination of Costs Following Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Parole Board should pay the Claimant's costs after unreasonably refusing to concede the claim or sign a consent order
  2. 2 Whether the Parole Board's conduct amounted to unreasonable behaviour justifying a costs order

Ratio Decidendi

The Parole Board's failure to concede the claim or agree to a consent order in the face of clear authority and obvious error was unreasonable. This conduct justifies a costs order against the Board, consistent with the principles in Davies and subsequent authorities.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to Claimant

Orders

  • The Parole Board for England and Wales shall pay the Claimant’s costs, including those of the costs application.