Dr Vikram Bhat & Anor v Smruti Patel
The partnership, after changes in membership, continued on the terms of the 2014 Partnership Agreement as agreed by all partners, subject to changes in identity and profit shares. Clause 44 did not prevent this adoption. The claimant was entitled to payment of arrears of the annual fixed sum in advance of dissolution accounts, as the defendants had appropriated profits without regard to her entitlement and the claim was clear and quantifiable. Potential liabilities (e.g. to NHS) did not preclude payment, as defendants themselves drew profits without accounting for such liabilities.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Dr Vikram Bhat; Appellant/defendant: Geetha Bhat; Respondent/claimant: Smruti Patel
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Partnership Dissolution, Variation of Partnership Agreement, Priority of Partner Payments, Accounting in Partnerships, Effect of Technical Dissolution, No Oral Modification Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Vikram Bhat
Appellant/defendant
Geetha Bhat
Appellant/defendant
Smruti Patel
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the partnership was governed by the 2014 Partnership Agreement or was a partnership at will after changes in membership
- 2 Whether Clause 44 (no oral modification) prevented adoption of prior terms by new partners
- 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to payment of arrears in advance of dissolution accounts
Ratio Decidendi
The partnership, after changes in membership, continued on the terms of the 2014 Partnership Agreement as agreed by all partners, subject to changes in identity and profit shares. Clause 44 did not prevent this adoption. The claimant was entitled to payment of arrears of the annual fixed sum in advance of dissolution accounts, as the defendants had appropriated profits without regard to her entitlement and the claim was clear and quantifiable. Potential liabilities (e.g. to NHS) did not preclude payment, as defendants themselves drew profits without accounting for such liabilities.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; judgment for claimant for £212,600 plus interest stands
- Costs order in favour of claimant stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment