Najeeb & Ors, R. v

Najeeb & Ors, R. v

Sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive given the gravity, organisation, and prolonged nature of the riot, the targeting of police, and the scale of damage and injury; discount for guilty plea was appropriately limited due to overwhelming video evidence; origins of violence should be considered but do not...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Parvais Najeeb; Appellant: Qazi; Appellant: Mahmood; Appellant: Raja; Applicant: Maskin; Applicant: Shazad Ali; Applicant: Pandoor; Applicant: Latif; Applicant: Azad; Applicant: Hussain; Applicant: Hanif; Applicant: Qurban; Applicant: Khalil; Applicant: Khan; Applicant: Raza; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 January 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeals allowed in part; most sentences upheld; some reduced.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Riot, Violent Disorder, Mitigation, Discount for Guilty Plea, Manifestly Excessive Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Riot Violent Disorder Mitigation Discount for Guilty Plea Manifestly Excessive Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Parvais Najeeb

Appellant

Qazi

Appellant

Mahmood

Appellant

Raja

Appellant

Maskin

Applicant

Shazad Ali

Applicant

Pandoor

Applicant

Latif

Applicant

Azad

Applicant

Hussain

Applicant

Hanif

Applicant

Qurban

Applicant

Khalil

Applicant

Khan

Applicant

Raza

Applicant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sentences imposed for riot and violent disorder were manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing bands for riot participation
  3. 3 Effect of mitigation and guilty pleas on sentence length

Ratio Decidendi

Sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive given the gravity, organisation, and prolonged nature of the riot, the targeting of police, and the scale of damage and injury; discount for guilty plea was appropriately limited due to overwhelming video evidence; origins of violence should be considered but do not outweigh the seriousness of the conduct; individual appeals allowed only where participation and mitigation justified reduction.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed in part; most sentences upheld; some reduced.

Orders

  • Najeeb: sentence reduced from 4 years to 3 years imprisonment
  • Qazi: sentence reduced from 4 years to 2 years imprisonment