Laura Thurgood v Danielle Laight & Anor
The claimant owned goodwill in the business name WASH WIGGLE & WAG in the relevant territory. The defendants' use of the identical name for identical services in the same area constituted misrepresentation, which caused damage to the claimant's business. The tort of passing off was established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Laura Thurgood; First Defendant: Danielle Laight; Second Defendant: Wash Wiggle & Wag Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Liability Trial (split Trial, Liability Only)
- Outcome
- Claim for passing off established in favour of the claimant. Liability found against both defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Damage, Business Names
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laura Thurgood
Claimant
Danielle Laight
First Defendant
Wash Wiggle & Wag Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Liability Trial (split Trial, Liability Only)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant owned goodwill in the business name WASH WIGGLE & WAG during the relevant period
- 2 Whether the defendants' use of WASH WIGGLE & WAG constituted a misrepresentation
- 3 Whether the claimant suffered damage as a result of the defendants' acts
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant owned goodwill in the business name WASH WIGGLE & WAG in the relevant territory. The defendants' use of the identical name for identical services in the same area constituted misrepresentation, which caused damage to the claimant's business. The tort of passing off was established.
Court Disposition
Claim for passing off established in favour of the claimant. Liability found against both defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment