Laura Thurgood v Danielle Laight & Anor

Laura Thurgood v Danielle Laight & Anor

The claimant owned goodwill in the business name WASH WIGGLE & WAG in the relevant territory. The defendants' use of the identical name for identical services in the same area constituted misrepresentation, which caused damage to the claimant's business. The tort of passing off was established.

Parties
Claimant: Laura Thurgood; First Defendant: Danielle Laight; Second Defendant: Wash Wiggle & Wag Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Liability Trial (split Trial, Liability Only)
Outcome
Claim for passing off established in favour of the claimant. Liability found against both defendants.
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Damage, Business Names

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laura Thurgood

Claimant

Danielle Laight

First Defendant

Wash Wiggle & Wag Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Intellectual Property / Liability Trial (split Trial, Liability Only)

  1. 1 Whether the claimant owned goodwill in the business name WASH WIGGLE & WAG during the relevant period
  2. 2 Whether the defendants' use of WASH WIGGLE & WAG constituted a misrepresentation
  3. 3 Whether the claimant suffered damage as a result of the defendants' acts

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant owned goodwill in the business name WASH WIGGLE & WAG in the relevant territory. The defendants' use of the identical name for identical services in the same area constituted misrepresentation, which caused damage to the claimant's business. The tort of passing off was established.

Court Disposition

Claim for passing off established in favour of the claimant. Liability found against both defendants.