Ann-Marie Janice Smith & Anor. v Pastor John Charles Surridge & Ors.
The reference email bears a Chase level 1 meaning: during their employment at the School, each claimant did something that gave rise to a safeguarding issue, namely causing harm to a child or placing a child at risk of harm. This is defamatory at common law and is a statement of fact.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ann-Marie Janice Smith; Claimant: Kaydon Judydeen Jackson; Defendant: Pastor John Charles Surridge; Defendant: Pastor Ian Sweeney; Defendant: Pastor Emmaniel Osei; Defendant: Mr Kaz James
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue Trial
- Outcome
- Determination of preliminary issues: the reference email is defamatory at common law and is a statement of fact.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Misuse of Private Information, Negligent Misstatement, Natural and Ordinary Meaning, Chase Levels, Repetition Rule
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ann-Marie Janice Smith
Claimant
Kaydon Judydeen Jackson
Claimant
Pastor John Charles Surridge
Defendant
Pastor Ian Sweeney
Defendant
Pastor Emmaniel Osei
Defendant
Mr Kaz James
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the reference email?
- 2 Is the meaning defamatory at common law?
- 3 Is the statement one of fact or opinion?
Ratio Decidendi
The reference email bears a Chase level 1 meaning: during their employment at the School, each claimant did something that gave rise to a safeguarding issue, namely causing harm to a child or placing a child at risk of harm. This is defamatory at common law and is a statement of fact.
Court Disposition
Determination of preliminary issues: the reference email is defamatory at common law and is a statement of fact.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment