Anderson v Shetland Islands Council and another
The cumulative effect of Mrs Anderson's impecuniosity, lack of merit in her appeal, refusal of legal aid, inability to obtain certification from Scottish counsel, and duplicative proceedings justifies ordering her to give security for the respondents' costs. There is no basis in law or fact to order the respondents...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Patricia Anderson; First Respondent: Shetland Islands Council; Second Respondent: Scottish Water
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Security for Costs Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Respondents' application for security for costs granted; appellant's application refused.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Judicial Review, Costs Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patricia Anderson
Appellant
Shetland Islands Council
First Respondent
Scottish Water
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Security for Costs Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be ordered to give security for the respondents' costs of the appeal
- 2 Whether the respondents should be ordered to give security for the appellant's costs
Ratio Decidendi
The cumulative effect of Mrs Anderson's impecuniosity, lack of merit in her appeal, refusal of legal aid, inability to obtain certification from Scottish counsel, and duplicative proceedings justifies ordering her to give security for the respondents' costs. There is no basis in law or fact to order the respondents to give security for her costs.
Court Disposition
Respondents' application for security for costs granted; appellant's application refused.
Orders
- Mrs Anderson to give security in the amount of £20,000 for each respondent, payable by cheque to the UK Supreme Court Security Fund within 28 days.
- Mrs Anderson's request for security from respondents refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment