Boaden, R v

Boaden, R v

The convictions were unsafe because the trial judge failed to direct the jury to consider each count separately, failed to explain the elements of the offences, and failed to properly direct on the burden and standard of proof. These defects were so serious that the applicant did not have a fair trial, and the verdicts could not be considered safe.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Patricia Boaden
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 December 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal allowed, convictions quashed, no retrial ordered
Legal Topics
Fraud, Dishonesty, Benefit Fraud, Jury Directions, Burden of Proof, Separate Verdicts, Extension of Time, Retrial Discretion
Criminal Law Fraud Dishonesty Benefit Fraud Jury Directions Burden of Proof Separate Verdicts Extension of Time +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Patricia Boaden

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's summing-up was defective for failing to direct the jury on dishonesty, separate treatment of counts, and burden of proof
  2. 2 Whether the convictions were unsafe due to these defects
  3. 3 Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The convictions were unsafe because the trial judge failed to direct the jury to consider each count separately, failed to explain the elements of the offences, and failed to properly direct on the burden and standard of proof. These defects were so serious that the applicant did not have a fair trial, and the verdicts could not be considered safe.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed, convictions quashed, no retrial ordered

Orders

  • Leave to appeal on grounds 2 and 3 granted out of time
  • Convictions quashed