Sovereign Trustees Ltd & Anor v Lewis
There was ample objective evidence that neither the employer nor the trustee intended to alter the basis for spouses’ pension increases in the April, October, or January Deeds. The changes resulted from drafting errors, and the deeds failed to reflect the parties’ common intention. Rectification was therefore granted.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sovereign Trustees Ltd; Claimant: 1Life Management Solutions Ltd; Defendant: Patricia Lewis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (rectification of Pension Scheme Trust Deeds) / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Rectification granted
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trust Deeds, Pension Scheme Amendments, Summary Judgment Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sovereign Trustees Ltd
Claimant
1Life Management Solutions Ltd
Claimant
Patricia Lewis
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (rectification of Pension Scheme Trust Deeds) / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the April, October, and January Deeds should be rectified to reflect the true intention of the parties regarding spouses’ pension increases
- 2 Whether there was a common continuing intention between the employer and trustee at the time of execution of the deeds
- 3 Whether the deeds failed to reflect that intention due to a drafting error
Ratio Decidendi
There was ample objective evidence that neither the employer nor the trustee intended to alter the basis for spouses’ pension increases in the April, October, or January Deeds. The changes resulted from drafting errors, and the deeds failed to reflect the parties’ common intention. Rectification was therefore granted.
Court Disposition
Rectification granted
Orders
- Rectification of the April, October, and January Deeds to reflect the intended basis for spouses’ pension increases
- Order amended under the slip rule on 13th September 2016 to correct minor errors
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment