Patricia O' Hanlon v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Patricia O' Hanlon v The Information Commissioner & Anor

The Tribunal found that further information within the scope of the request was held by HSE but had not been disclosed at the time of the Commissioner’s Decision Notice. This information has since been disclosed. The Tribunal was not persuaded that any further material is held. The application of regulation 12(5)(b) to withhold certain information was justified, and the public interest test favored non-disclosure. The appeal was allowed to the extent that further information was held and has now been disclosed, but no further direction was made.

Parties
Appellant: Patricia O’Hanlon; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Health and Safety Executive
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 / Environmental Information Regulations 2004 / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; substituted decision notice issued.
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, Environmental Information Regulations, Public Authority Disclosure, Personal Data, Public Interest Test
Administrative Law Information Law Environmental Law Freedom of Information Environmental Information Regulations Public Authority Disclosure Personal Data Public Interest Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patricia O’Hanlon

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Health and Safety Executive

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Freedom of Information Act 2000 / Environmental Information Regulations 2004 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) held further information within the scope of the Appellant’s request under the EIR.
  2. 2 Whether HSE was entitled to rely on regulation 12(5)(b) EIR to withhold information.
  3. 3 Whether the public interest test under EIR justified non-disclosure of certain information.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that further information within the scope of the request was held by HSE but had not been disclosed at the time of the Commissioner’s Decision Notice. This information has since been disclosed. The Tribunal was not persuaded that any further material is held. The application of regulation 12(5)(b) to withhold certain information was justified, and the public interest test favored non-disclosure. The appeal was allowed to the extent that further information was held and has now been disclosed, but no further direction was made.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; substituted decision notice issued.

Orders

  • It is declared that further information within the scope of the request was held and has now been disclosed.
  • No further direction is made to the Second Respondent.