Jessemey, R. v

Jessemey, R. v

Due to procedural errors in the committal and indictment process, the Crown Court's sentencing powers were limited to those of the Magistrates' Court, making the maximum lawful sentence 6 months' imprisonment. The applicant was entitled to a full discount for his guilty plea, resulting in a sentence of 4 months' imprisonment. The SHPO duration was reduced to 7 years to align with the notification requirements.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Patrick Albert Jessemey
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Procedural Errors, Powers of Criminal Courts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Patrick Albert Jessemey

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the Crown Court had jurisdiction to impose a sentence greater than the Magistrates' Court maximum due to procedural errors
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed exceeded the lawful maximum
  3. 3 Whether the Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) duration should be reduced

Ratio Decidendi

Due to procedural errors in the committal and indictment process, the Crown Court's sentencing powers were limited to those of the Magistrates' Court, making the maximum lawful sentence 6 months' imprisonment. The applicant was entitled to a full discount for his guilty plea, resulting in a sentence of 4 months' imprisonment. The SHPO duration was reduced to 7 years to align with the notification requirements.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence of 3 years' imprisonment quashed and substituted with 4 months' imprisonment
  • SHPO duration reduced to 7 years