Sevenoaks District Council v Patrick Delaney & Ors

Sevenoaks District Council v Patrick Delaney & Ors

All defendants are liable for contempt of court for breach of the Dove and Hill injunction orders by occupying and developing the land after effective service, regardless of their knowledge or understanding of the order's terms. Illiteracy and lack of welfare or human rights assessments do not affect liability. Some minor works (CCTV, steps, certain repairs) were not found to be 'development' or in breach to the criminal standard. The main breaches occurred between service of the Dove order and the Hill order, and liability is established to the criminal standard.

Parties
Claimant: Sevenoaks District Council; Defendant: Patrick Delaney; Defendant: William Harrington; Defendant: John Quilligan; Defendant: Thomas O’Brien; Defendant: Thomas Coffey; Defendant: Persons Unknown Carrying Out and/or Encouraging/and/or Facilitating Development on, or with an Intent to Undertake Development on or to Occupy, the Land at Seasons Farm, Pootings Road, Crockham Hill, Kent TN8 6SD as shown edged in red on the map attached to the orders of Dove J and Hill J without lawful planning consent; Defendant: Amanda Coffey; Defendant: Chantelle Harrington; Defendant: Sharon O’Brien; Defendant: Katerina O’Brien; Defendant: Naomi O’Brien
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil (injunction/contempt) / Liability Judgment on Contempt of Court
Outcome
Defendants found in contempt of court for breach of injunctions; further hearing to determine sanctions.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunctions, Planning Permission, Article 8 ECHR, Equality Act 2010, Children Act 1989
Civil Procedure Planning Law Human Rights Contempt of Court Injunctions Planning Permission Article 8 ECHR Equality Act 2010 +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sevenoaks District Council

Claimant

Patrick Delaney

Defendant

William Harrington

Defendant

John Quilligan

Defendant

Thomas O’Brien

Defendant

Thomas Coffey

Defendant

Persons Unknown Carrying Out and/or Encouraging/and/or Facilitating Development on, or with an Intent to Undertake Development on or to Occupy, the Land at Seasons Farm, Pootings Road, Crockham Hill, Kent TN8 6SD as shown edged in red on the map attached to the orders of Dove J and Hill J without lawful planning consent

Defendant

Amanda Coffey

Defendant

Chantelle Harrington

Defendant

Sharon O’Brien

Defendant

Katerina O’Brien

Defendant

Naomi O’Brien

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (injunction/contempt) / Liability Judgment on Contempt of Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants breached the terms of interim and continued injunctions (Dove and Hill orders) by developing and occupying land without planning permission
  2. 2 Whether the defendants are in contempt of court for breach of injunctions
  3. 3 Whether illiteracy or lack of knowledge of the order's terms is a defence to contempt

Ratio Decidendi

All defendants are liable for contempt of court for breach of the Dove and Hill injunction orders by occupying and developing the land after effective service, regardless of their knowledge or understanding of the order's terms. Illiteracy and lack of welfare or human rights assessments do not affect liability. Some minor works (CCTV, steps, certain repairs) were not found to be 'development' or in breach to the criminal standard. The main breaches occurred between service of the Dove order and the Hill order, and liability is established to the criminal standard.

Court Disposition

Defendants found in contempt of court for breach of injunctions; further hearing to determine sanctions.

Orders

  • Liability for contempt established against all named defendants for breach of the Dove and Hill orders as specified.
  • Further evidence and submissions to be heard on sanctions.