Patrick Hughes v Martin Bellamy & Ors
Given the recent undisclosed sale of assets by the third defendant, the lack of disclosure to the claimant, and the ongoing factual disputes in the Isle of Man unfair prejudice proceedings, there is sufficient risk of dissipation to justify a short-term injunction to preserve the assets of the second and third defendants until the return date. The American Cyanamid test is satisfied, and, if necessary, the freezing order test is also met on the facts.
- Parties
- Applicant: Patrick Hughes; First Respondent: Martin Bellamy; Second Respondent: Pathfinder 1 Limited; Third Respondent: AI Pathfinder Inc Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Unfair Prejudice, Asset Preservation, Jurisdictional Support
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Hughes
Applicant
Martin Bellamy
First Respondent
Pathfinder 1 Limited
Second Respondent
AI Pathfinder Inc Limited
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a short-term injunction to preserve assets of the second and third defendants pending resolution of Isle of Man unfair prejudice proceedings
- 2 Whether there is a sufficient risk of dissipation of assets to justify injunctive relief
- 3 Whether the American Cyanamid test or freezing order principles apply
Ratio Decidendi
Given the recent undisclosed sale of assets by the third defendant, the lack of disclosure to the claimant, and the ongoing factual disputes in the Isle of Man unfair prejudice proceedings, there is sufficient risk of dissipation to justify a short-term injunction to preserve the assets of the second and third defendants until the return date. The American Cyanamid test is satisfied, and, if necessary, the freezing order test is also met on the facts.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted
Orders
- Second and third defendants are restrained from disposing of or dealing with any of their assets, except for payment of legal expenses and other payments on 24 hours' written notice to the claimant, until the return date.
- Cross-undertaking in damages by the claimant; fortification to be considered at the return date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment