Waldron & Ors v Waldron & Anor [2019] EWHC 115 (Ch) (15 February 2019)

Waldron & Ors v Waldron & Anor [2019] EWHC 115 (Ch) (15 February 2019)

The court found that Patrick Waldron's conduct, including the acquisition of DCT assets through Tunnelling and the exclusion and dismissal of Austin and Gerard Waldron, was unfairly prejudicial to the petitioners' interests as members of a quasi-partnership family company. The existence of third-party shareholders (SIG) did not remove the equitable constraints arising from the family relationship and mutual understandings. Breaches of fiduciary duty by Patrick as director were established and amounted to unfair prejudice. Relief in the form of a share purchase order was appropriate, with the basis of valuation to be determined at a later stage.

Citation
[2019] EWHC 115 (Ch)
Parties
Petitioner: Austin Michael Waldron; Petitioner: Gerard Dermot Waldron; Petitioner: Marian Waldron; Respondent: Patrick James Waldron; Respondent: Westshield Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 (unfair Prejudice) / Judgment on Liability and Basis of Relief (quantum Reserved)
Outcome
Petition allowed in part; finding of unfair prejudice. Relief to be granted by way of share purchase order, with basis of valuation to be determined.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Quasi Partnership, Director Fiduciary Duties, Shareholder Disputes, Section 994 Companies Act 2006
Company Law Equity Unfair Prejudice Quasi Partnership Director Fiduciary Duties Shareholder Disputes Section 994 Companies Act 2006

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Austin Michael Waldron

Petitioner

Gerard Dermot Waldron

Petitioner

Marian Waldron

Petitioner

Patrick James Waldron

Respondent

Westshield Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition Under Companies Act 2006 S.994 (unfair Prejudice) / Judgment on Liability and Basis of Relief (quantum Reserved)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the affairs of Westshield Limited were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to the petitioners' interests under s.994 Companies Act 2006
  2. 2 Whether the company was a quasi-partnership and subject to equitable constraints
  3. 3 Whether Patrick Waldron breached fiduciary duties as director

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Patrick Waldron's conduct, including the acquisition of DCT assets through Tunnelling and the exclusion and dismissal of Austin and Gerard Waldron, was unfairly prejudicial to the petitioners' interests as members of a quasi-partnership family company. The existence of third-party shareholders (SIG) did not remove the equitable constraints arising from the family relationship and mutual understandings. Breaches of fiduciary duty by Patrick as director were established and amounted to unfair prejudice. Relief in the form of a share purchase order was appropriate, with the basis of valuation to be determined at a later stage.

Court Disposition

Petition allowed in part; finding of unfair prejudice. Relief to be granted by way of share purchase order, with basis of valuation to be determined.

Orders

  • Patrick Waldron to purchase the petitioners' shares in Westshield Limited; basis of valuation (including discount, if any) to be determined in subsequent proceedings.