Paul A, R. v

Paul A, R. v

The combination of inadmissible evidence of domestic violence heard by the jury, the unavailability of key records and witnesses due to delay, and failures in police record-keeping created specific prejudice to the defence and undermined the safety of the convictions. The trial judge's directions did not...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Paul A
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; convictions quashed
Legal Topics
Historic Sexual Abuse, Delay in Prosecution, Jury Directions, Admissibility of Evidence, Safety of Conviction
Criminal Law Historic Sexual Abuse Delay in Prosecution Jury Directions Admissibility of Evidence Safety of Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Paul A

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the convictions for indecent assault were safe given the delay between alleged offences and trial
  2. 2 Whether the admission of inadmissible evidence of domestic violence rendered the trial unfair
  3. 3 Whether the absence of records and witnesses due to delay prejudiced the defence

Ratio Decidendi

The combination of inadmissible evidence of domestic violence heard by the jury, the unavailability of key records and witnesses due to delay, and failures in police record-keeping created specific prejudice to the defence and undermined the safety of the convictions. The trial judge's directions did not sufficiently address the impact of these factors. The convictions are unsafe and must be quashed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; convictions quashed

Orders

  • Convictions for indecent assault quashed