R v Paul Anthony Glynn
The imposition of three consecutive sentences was not justified on the evidence; only two separate occasions of receipt could be inferred. The appellant was entitled to one-third credit for his early guilty plea, but the sentence could not fall below 80% of the statutory minimum. The total sentence is reduced to 12 years' imprisonment, with two consecutive terms of six years each and all other terms concurrent.
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Anthony Glynn; Respondent: Rex (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Sentencing, Consecutive and Concurrent Sentences, Credit for Guilty Plea, Statutory Minimum Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Anthony Glynn
Appellant
Rex (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imposition of consecutive sentences for firearms offences was appropriate when all items were found on the same occasion
- 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to more than 20% credit for an early guilty plea despite a statutory minimum sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The imposition of three consecutive sentences was not justified on the evidence; only two separate occasions of receipt could be inferred. The appellant was entitled to one-third credit for his early guilty plea, but the sentence could not fall below 80% of the statutory minimum. The total sentence is reduced to 12 years' imprisonment, with two consecutive terms of six years each and all other terms concurrent.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Total sentence reduced to 12 years' imprisonment: six years on count 1, consecutive six years on count 3, all other terms concurrent.
- All other sentences and orders remain unaffected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment